Instructor
The Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: Depression Programme by NAFS Academy is a Level 6 CPD-accredited course designed for multi-disciplinary professionals seeking to understand and apply CBT principles in the context of depression.
This comprehensive programme provides a step-by-step exploration of depression, beginning with its diagnostic criteria, prevalence, and neurobiological foundations, and progressing to the CBT model of thoughts, emotions, behaviours, and physical responses. Participants learn how negative thinking patterns and avoidance behaviours maintain depression and how these can be effectively addressed through structured CBT interventions.
The course focuses on developing practical skills, including:
Through interactive activities, case discussions, and guided exercises, participants are encouraged to apply learning to real-world scenarios while maintaining appropriate professional boundaries. The programme also emphasises evidence-based practice, cultural sensitivity, and ethical considerations, ensuring participants can work confidently within their scope and refer when necessary.
Designed for flexible delivery (face-to-face, online, or blended), this course equips professionals with the knowledge and tools to support individuals experiencing depression, improve outcomes, and contribute to reducing stigma around mental health.
Check the frequently asked questions about this course.
This course includes 8 modules, 8 lessons, and 0 hours of materials.
SESSION 1: Introduction to CBT & the Depression Model
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time
Activity
Notes
0:00–0:10
Welcome, introductions, housekeeping
Emphasise no clinical experience assumed; all levels welcome
0:10–0:20
Pre-session reflection: "What do you already know about CBT?"
Pair share or chat box (online)
0:20–0:50
Presentation + video: What is CBT? Evidence base, cognitive model
Session 1 PowerPoint + Video S1
0:50–1:05
Small group discussion: Beck's 4-domain cycle in your work
Break-out rooms or table groups
1:05–1:15
Workbook activity: Reflection prompts S1
Individual written reflection
1:15–1:25
Knowledge check: 4 questions (show-of-hands or Mentimeter)
Debrief answers with evidence citations
1:25–1:30
Preview Session 2; signpost quiz app and workbook
Set pre-reading if blended format
Key Points to Emphasise:
CBT is not "positive thinking" — it is evidence-based thinking
The 4-domain cycle is bidirectional — any entry point is valid for intervention
d = 0.79 means CBT has one of the largest effect sizes in psychological therapy (contextualise with "0.5 = medium, 0.8 = large")
Relapse prevention advantage of CBT over medication is clinically significant
Discussion Prompt S1: "Think of someone you have worked with recently. Can you identify an example of each of Beck's four domains operating in their presentation?" (Use anonymised examples only)
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time
Activity
Notes
0:00–0:05
Bridge from Session 1: "Name one thing that struck you"
Quick round or chat box
0:05–0:10
Pre-session reflection: "How confident are you in explaining depression to a client?"
1–5 self-rating; revisit at end
0:10–0:45
Presentation + video: DSM criteria, epidemiology, neurobiology
Session 2 PowerPoint + Video S2
0:45–1:05
Case activity: Apply DSM-5-TR criteria to 2 vignettes
Workbook or handout; small groups
1:05–1:20
Discussion: "Which neurobiological model is most relevant to your practice?"
Pairs; report back
1:20–1:28
Knowledge check: 4 questions
Debrief with citations
1:28–1:30
Preview Session 3; workbook risk factor reflection
Individual
Key Points to Emphasise:
Both (1) depressed mood AND (2) anhedonia are required at least one of — not both
280 million global figure comes from WHO 2023 — not an estimate, based on GBD data
The neuroplasticity model is clinically relevant because it explains WHY CBT produces durable change (BDNF increase)
Treatment gap (75% untreated globally) makes equitable identification a professional responsibility
Common Misconception to Address: "I thought depression was just a chemical imbalance." — Use the neuroplasticity model to show that biology and psychology are not separate. BDNF changes produced by CBT are equivalent to those produced by antidepressants (De Wandeler et al., 2022). The biopsychosocial model integrates all levels.
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time
Activity
Notes
0:00–0:08
Bridge: "What maintaining factor is most common in your caseload?"
Brief open discussion
0:08–0:40
Presentation + video: 5-part model, distortions, thought record
Session 3 PowerPoint + Video S3
0:40–1:00
Thought record practice: work through example as group
Use whiteboard/flipchart; facilitator models first
1:00–1:15
Small group: Identify distortions in 6 sample statements
Handout or workbook activity
1:15–1:23
Knowledge check: 4 questions
Debrief
1:23–1:30
Preview Session 4; set thought record homework
"Between now and Session 4, complete one thought record"
Facilitator Modelling Note: When modelling the thought record, use a facilitator example (not a clinical one) — e.g., "I delivered this training last week and someone challenged a statistic. My automatic thought was: 'I've got it wrong and they'll think I'm incompetent.'" This normalises NATs and reduces stigma without clinical disclosure.
Distortion Identification Activity — Sample Statements:
"I failed the driving test — I'm just a failure at everything." (Overgeneralisation)
"My manager said nothing about my report, so it must have been terrible." (Mind Reading / Mental Filter)
"If I don't get this promotion I might as well give up." (All-or-Nothing Thinking)
"I feel embarrassed, so I must have done something stupid." (Emotional Reasoning)
"I should be coping better than this." (Should Statements)
"This will definitely end badly." (Fortune Telling)
SESSION 4: Identifying & Challenging Negative Automatic Thoughts
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time
Activity
Notes
0:00–0:10
Homework review: thought record sharing (voluntary)
Pairs; no compulsion to share with group
0:10–0:45
Presentation + video: NAT characteristics, Socratic questioning, techniques
Session 4 PowerPoint + Video S4
0:45–1:05
Socratic questioning role play
Pairs: one plays "client", one plays "therapist" — 5 min each, then swap
1:05–1:15
Debrief: "What was difficult about asking Socratic questions without correcting?"
Open discussion
1:15–1:23
Knowledge check: 4 questions
Debrief
1:23–1:30
Preview Session 5; set BA monitoring homework
"Monitor your own activity and mood for 3 days using workbook diary"
Role Play Instructions:
"Client" describes a situation with a clear NAT (use their own or a provided vignette)
"Therapist" uses ONLY Socratic questions — no advice, no corrections, no "have you considered..."
After 5 minutes: "What did you notice about the experience as the client? As the therapist?"
Key insight to draw out: Guided discovery feels different from being corrected — it produces more durable belief change because the client reaches their own conclusions
Socratic Questioning Pitfall to Name: The most common facilitator/therapist error is the "Socratic question" that is actually a leading question disguised: "Have you ever considered that maybe you're being too hard on yourself?" — This is not Socratic; it is corrective. The client's answer is determined by the question.
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time
Activity
Notes
0:00–0:08
Bridge: review activity monitoring homework (3 days)
Pairs: "What patterns did you notice?"
0:08–0:40
Presentation + video: avoidance cycle, evidence, activity scheduling
Session 5 PowerPoint + Video S5
0:40–0:58
Activity scheduling practice: build a personal activity menu
Individual workbook activity
0:58–1:12
Small group: "What are the barriers to activity scheduling you see clinically?"
Table or break-out groups; facilitator notes on flipchart
1:12–1:20
Barrier problem-solving: address top 3 barriers with evidence-based strategies
Facilitator-led; use NICE CG90 guidance
1:20–1:28
Knowledge check: 4 questions
Debrief
1:28–1:30
Preview Session 6
Common Barriers to Activity Scheduling and Evidence-Based Responses:
Barrier
Evidence-Based Response
"I don't enjoy anything anymore"
This is anhedonia — a symptom, not a permanent state. Schedule activities anyway; wait rating (predict enjoyment before) vs actual rating (after) typically diverges.
"I'm too tired to do anything"
Grade the activity to current capacity. Walking to the end of the street counts. BA improves energy over time — not the reverse.
"I'll do it when I feel better"
This is the inverse of the BA rationale. Action precedes feeling in depression — not the other way around.
"My client refuses to try"
Explore function of avoidance collaboratively. What does the avoidance protect from? What does the activity threaten?
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time
Activity
Notes
0:00–0:08
Bridge: review Session 5; any activity scheduling reflections
Open brief sharing
0:08–0:40
Presentation + video: cognitive hierarchy, clusters, downward arrow, change methods
Session 6 PowerPoint + Video S6
0:40–1:00
Downward arrow demonstration + practice
Facilitator demonstrates first; then pairs
1:00–1:15
Positive data log introduction: complete day 1 entry
Workbook activity; explain rationale carefully
1:15–1:23
Knowledge check: 4 questions
Debrief
1:23–1:30
Preview Session 7; set positive data log homework
7-day log
Downward Arrow Facilitation Notes:
Always model the technique before asking participants to try it
Emphasise: this is a clinical technique requiring therapeutic alliance and supervision — not for impromptu use in any professional conversation
If participants feel emotionally activated during the exercise, normalise this and offer a break
Debrief question: "What core belief did you arrive at? Was it surprising or familiar?"
Caution for Non-Clinical Participants: Some participants will not be trained therapists. Clarify that: (1) Core belief work is described here for awareness and clinical literacy; (2) Application in practice requires supervised clinical training; (3) The positive data log is a general wellbeing tool that is safe for self-use.
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time
Activity
Notes
0:00–0:08
Bridge: positive data log review (voluntary sharing)
Pairs; normalise if no evidence found yet
0:08–0:38
Presentation + video: relapse epidemiology, kindling, MBCT, wellbeing plan
Session 7 PowerPoint + Video S7
0:38–1:10
Wellbeing plan completion: work through all 7 sections
Individual workbook activity; facilitator circulates
1:10–1:20
Pair share: "What was the most useful section of the wellbeing plan and why?"
Brief sharing
1:20–1:28
Knowledge check: 4 questions
Debrief
1:28–1:30
Preview Session 8; set final reflection task
"Before Session 8, identify 3 practice changes you will make"
MBCT Clarification Note: MBCT is mentioned in this programme as an evidence-based relapse prevention tool. It is not delivered within this CPD. If participants ask where to access MBCT: Recommend Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2013) Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression (2nd ed.) as the practitioner text; and the MBCT.com resource directory for trained MBCT providers.
Recommended Duration: 90 minutes
Time / Activity / Notes
0:00–0:10 Full programme review: "One thing that has changed in how you think about depression?"
Quick round — all participants
0:10–0:40 Presentation + video: evidence synthesis, destigmatisation, case integration
Session 8 PowerPoint + Video S8
0:40–1:00 Maria case formulation: complete 5P in small groups
Workbook p.8; groups of 3–4; debrief as whole group
1:00–1:12 Professional practice action plan: 3 SMART changes
Individual workbook activity
1:12–1:18 CPD assessment instructions: demonstrate quiz app
Project quiz app; walk through navigation
1:18–1:28 Assessment time (or set as post-session task)
24 questions; 70% pass; unlimited resits
1:28–1:30 Closing, certificate instructions, signpost further reading
Case Formulation Debrief — Maria:
Expected formulation elements:
Presenting: Moderate-severe depression (PHQ-9 = 18); 6 months duration; significant functional impairment; social withdrawal; self-critical cognitions
Predisposing: Critical early attachment (mother); pattern of perfectionism; possible early maladaptive schema: Unlovability/Helplessness
Precipitating: Occupational stress; possible recent performance-related trigger
Perpetuating: Avoidance of friends; stopped exercise; negative automatic thoughts ('worthless', 'a burden'); rumination; perfectionism maintaining standard
Protective: High insight; strong motivation; supportive partner; two close friends available; no prior treatment (good prognosis indicator)
Reply to Comment